People's Bank v. Dalton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Kingfisher County. Action to recover usurious interest paid.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Bierer, J.:
Adeline L. Dalton, the defendant in error, brought this action against George Newer. Fred War- nicke and Eosa Smith, partners, doing business under the firm name of the People’s Bank, on the 10th of July, 1893, to recover the usurious interest paid upon two certain promissory notes made by her to the People’s Bank, that is, to recover all interest paid ou said notes in excess of twelve per cent, per annum. The complaint was in two paragraphs and described the notes in detail and stated the amount of interest paid on each note, and showed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parkersburg v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Blain v. WillsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Musselman v. McElhennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- First National Bank v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
- Wood v. CuthbertsonSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Covington v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Cameron & Henderson, Inc. v. FranksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- SILOAM SPRINGS HOTEL, LLC v. CENTURY SURETY COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Seawell v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- Melton v. SnowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.