Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Weborg v. Jenny

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2012No. 2010AP258Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

¶ 78. SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J.

(concurring in part and dissenting in part). I agree with the majority that the circuit court erred when it granted the physicians' motion in limine and allowed the jury to learn that the plaintiffs received over $1.4 million in life insurance proceeds and $3,300 per month in social security benefits as a result of Mr. Weborg's untimely death. See, e.g., majority op., ¶¶ 7, 66. The evidence was not relevant to any disputed issue in the present case.

¶ 79. I dissent, however, because I cannot assuredly say, as the majority does (¶ 69), that the error does not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hrnjak v. Graymar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. BillingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Werner v. LaneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API