Robert J. Wright v. Lane County District Court, and David Burks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Robert J. Wright brought this declaratory judgment action challenging the constitutionality of the Oregon statute prohibiting the unauthorized practice of law. He contends that the statute 1 is impermissibly vague and contradictory. After Wright had filed three successive complaints in the district court, the magistrate recommended that the case be dismissed. The court dismissed the action for want of jurisdiction. The action should have been dismissed under Fed.R.Civ.P, 12(bX6); however, we affirm the judgment of dismissal.
In an action nearly identical to this one, the Arizona statutes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hackin v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hackin v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mangels v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Latta v. OtterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Mangels v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Citizens for Legislative Choice v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.