Legal Opinion

Shields Limited Partnership v. Boo Nathaniel Bradberry and 40/40 Enterprises

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 25, 2015No. 05-14-00258-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

Justice Myers

This case involves the right to possession of the property containing the San Francisco Rose restaurant in Dallas, Texas. Shields Limited Partnership (“Shields”) appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding possession of the premises to Boo Nathaniel Bradberry and 40/40 Enterprises, Inc. in this suit for forcible de-tainer. Shields brings one issue on appeal contending the trial court erred by awarding possession of the property to appellees. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

BACKGROUND

In 1997, Bernard E. Shields owned the property containing the San…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Frost National Bank v. L & F Distributors, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shields Ltd. Partnership v. BradberryTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Shields Limited Partnership v. 40/40 Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API