Legal Opinion
Higginbotham v. Higginbotham
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 11, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
84 N.J. Super. 232 (1964)
201 A.2d 581
SARAH E. HIGGINBOTHAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EDWARD HUGHES HIGGINBOTHAM, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided June 11, 1964.
Mr. John G. Dluhy, attorney for plaintiff
Messrs. Lieblich & Cole, attorney for defendant (Mr. Herbert A. Vogel, of counsel).
PASHMAN, J.S.C.
This is a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment to enforce a lump sum alimony decree awarded by a Florida court. Plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife and owned two attached houses on East 7th Street in Clifton, each containing apartments. The parties moved to Florida,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of MetuchenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Simpson v. SimpsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1970