Legal Opinion

Muller v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 22, 1965Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

The present motion arises in an action under 35 U.S.C. § 146 to reconsider a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences adverse to the plaintiff Paul A. Muller in a two-party interference proceeding, No. 92,755. The interference was between plaintiff’s application Serial No. 841,919 and defendant’s patent 2-954,036. The count of the interference is a claim copied by plaintiff from defendant’s patent.

Plaintiff’s application was awarded the benefit of the filing date of his prior patent application Serial No. 502,016, filed April 18, 1955. Defendant’s filing date was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  2. Shell Development Co. v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1953
  3. Finch v. Van der Veer DillenbachCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  4. Jan A. Rajchman v. John M. Herbert and Anthony W. SimpsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API