Legal Opinion

Asbury Park & Ocean Grove Bank v. Giordano

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 20, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

If there appeared to be any substantial merit in this application, we should refuse to consider it unless on a notice to the plaintiff below, or on the return of a rule to show cause. But an examination of the appeal papers shows that the suit was against defendant on a promissory note, and that the defense, which was admitted in point of fact, was that a mortgage had been given to secure the note, and was held by the bank, and defendant therefore claimed that no action at law would lie on the note until the mortgage had been first foreclosed. This is the sole point in the state of the case…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. 79-83 Thirteenth Ave., Ltd. v. DeMarcoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Silver v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Birkins v. Seaboard ServiceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
  4. Wildwood Title & Trust Co. v. GeisenhonerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  5. Poultrymen's Service Corp. v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API