Legal Opinion
Birkins v. Seaboard Service
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 29, 1950No. Civ. A. 61-50PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, George Birkins and Daniel Ohl, citizens of the State of New York, filed a complaint against Seaboard Service, a New Jersey corporation, alleging a controversy between each of the plaintiffs and the defendant exceeding the sum of $3,000 exclusive of interests and costs and reciting three causes of action as follows:
In the first cause of action plaintiff Birkins alleges that he is the owner and holder of general mortgage bonds ofi the defendant in the aggregate principal sum of $12,080, each payable to bearer, and secured by a mortgage on real property,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Bullard v. City of CiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Schunk v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddart Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Honey v. George Hyman Construction Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1974
- Ferrara v. Philadelphia Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1967
- Bert A. Lynch, Jr. v. Martha Ann Lynch PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.