Legal Opinion

Maisano v. Spain

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 23, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The determination of the issue depended on the decision of two questions. One was a question of law and the other was a question of fact. The question of law had to do with the principle which the law would apply in running the division line between the properties of the complainant and defendants. Upon this point Judge Rodney charged the jury as follows:

“The question arises because of the fact that the lines in the deeds of the properties Nos. 715 Madison Street, owned by Spain, and 717 Madison Street, owned by Maisano, vary somewhat in direction from the center of the party…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowland v. DotyMichigan Court of Chancery · 1839
  2. Dale v. SmithCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1814

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pomilio v. CasertaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. Pomilio v. CasertaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API