Legal Opinion

Pomilio v. Caserta

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 28, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

This is a property-line encroachment case involving the discretionary nature of the mandatory injunction sought to compel the removal of the encroachment.

The basic facts are these:

The parties are owners of adjoining residential lots, subject to a side-yard building restriction prohibiting building within “ten feet of any dividing line of any adjoining lot or parcel of land.” In 1952, the defendants acquired their lot and built their home thereon. The next year, the plaintiffs pur chased the adjoining lot and built their home. In 1956, the defendants constructed an addition…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richard Paul, Inc. v. Union Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Western Maryland Dairy, Inc. v. ChenowithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Hammerberg v. LeinertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Rick v. CrampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Welshire, Inc. v. HarbisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. North River Insurance v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. Church of Religious Science v. FoxSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  3. Marc Kulick v. YSA Investments 1, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2026
  4. Marina View Condominium Association of Unit Owners v. Rehoboth Marina Ventures, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2019
  5. Quail Village Homeowner's Association, Inc., a corporation of the State of Delaware v. Janice RossellCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API