Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Lasselle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Allen Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, J.

We make this statement, that the question arising in this case may be fully understood: A. sold to B. a piece of land and made a deed for the same, with full covenants, that of seizin included, when A. had no title to convey, the title being in C., and he being in full and legal possession of all the land, having a perfect title to it. B. never had, nor had he any right to get possession of the land. Afterwards B. died, and his executor instituted a suit to recover damages for the breach of the covenant of seizin; and *426the only question is, can the executor maintain the suit, or is it the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Junction Railroad v. SayersIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Bottorf v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Frink v. BellisIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Wilson v. PeelleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Coleman v. LymanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Dehority v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API