Legal Opinion
Prall v. City of Boston
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 10-10058-RWZPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ZOBEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Allow Supplemental Briefing on the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Claim (Docket # 148) is allowed.
Plaintiffs Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket # 149) are overruled.
Upon consideration of the Report (Docket # 146) and plaintiffs objections thereto the court accepts it and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendations. Accordingly,
It is ORDERED:
1. Plaintiffs Motion For Summary Judgment (Docket # 121) is denied.
2. The Motion for Summary Judgment of the City of Boston (Docket # 128) is allowed.
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fraser v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Holden v. BarryDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020