Legal Opinion
Hussein M. Haekal v. Refco, Inc. And Ronald Von Neefe, Defendants-Respondents, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 20, 1999No. 1999PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
Claimant pro se Hussein M. Haekal, a resident of the Federal Republic of Germany who filed a complaint with respondent Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) against defendants Refco, Inc., and Ronald von Neefe, seeking reparations under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA” or “Act”), 7 U.S.C. % let seq. (1994), petitions this Court for review of an order of the CFTC denying Haekal’s motion for reconsideration of its dismissal of his complaint for failure to file a bond within the time limits imposed by the Commission. Hae-kal contends that the CFTC…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Harper v. ErcoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Ellul v. Congregation of Christian Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Alfred Veltri v. Building Service 32b-J Pension Fund and the Trustees of the Building Service 32b-J Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Silverman v. H.I.L. Associates Ltd. (In Re Allou Distributors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Hakeem O. Alli-Balogun v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.