Legal Opinion
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 30, 1990No. 89-5058PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from the denial of a motion to intervene filed by Ceradyne, Inc., in an action brought by Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., against the United States. Because we find that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over Eagle-Picher’s claim, we do not reach the merits of Ceradyne’s efforts to intervene.
Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., manages, as an agent of the federal government, a facility for the United States Department of Energy (DOE) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. When it procures supplies for the facility, Martin Marietta…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- State of New Mexico v. Donald T. Regan, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Coggeshall Development Corp. v. William J. Diamond, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Air Traffic Controllers Association v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Glenborough New Mexico Associates v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1992
- Hamilton Stores, Inc. v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.