Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Gurley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 23, 1962No. 39092PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

1. Before the head of a household can be held liable for the negligent operation of a family automobile by a member of his family, it must be shown that such operator was a member of his family and that the automobile was a *577family-purpose vehicle. Studdard v. Turner, 91 Ga. App. 318 (85 SE2d 537); Marques v. Ross, 105 Ga. App. 133 (123 SE2d 412), and cases cited therein. The leading cases on this principle of law are Griffin v. Russell, 144 Ga. 275 (87 SE 10, LRA 1916F 216, AC 1917D 994), and Hubert v. Harpe, 181 Ga. 168 (182 SE 167). In order for the “family-car” doctrine to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Griffin v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  2. Hubert v. HarpeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Durden v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  4. Fountain v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Marques v. RossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moody v. Nides Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Ferguson v. GurleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Walden v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Ferguson v. GurleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Ferguson v. GurleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API