Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1994No. 93-280PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
This case presents the question whether the trial court erred when it refused to submit to the jury a particular interrogatory requested by the defendant. For the reasons stated herein, we hold that the trial court did not err, and consequently we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.
The interrogatory requested by Norfolk & Western stated:
*613“Question No. 3: Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that the Railway was negligent which directly and proximately caused the collision? Answer Yes or No.
“ANSWER:__If Yes’, state the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Riley v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Ziegler v. Wendel Poultry Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Cincinnati Riverfront Coliseum, Inc. v. McNulty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Clinton Physical Therapy Services, P.C. v. John Deere Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Berge v. Columbus Community Cable AccessOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bobb Forest Products, Inc. v. Morbark Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Weidner v. BlazicOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Clark v. DoeOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.