Legal Opinion

Paul Louis Lockhart v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 11, 1961No. 16848PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court permitted appellant to file notice of appeal without payment of fee but denied him leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, certifying that the appeal was without merit and so not taken in good faith.

Appellant challenges this certificate and seeks leave from us to prosecute the appeal in forma pauperis. He also asks for the appointment of counsel to represent him.

The appeal is from an order, which made denial on its face of a motion by appellant for vacation of his sentence, under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.

Appellant had waived indictment under Rule 7(b) of the Rules of Criminal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  2. Randazzo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  4. William Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  5. Herbert William Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan Ramon FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Jack SpadaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. United States v. Warren Allen DittrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  4. Joseph F. Bent, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  5. Ketchum v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API