Legal Opinion

Randazzo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1924No. 6571PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARIS, District Judge.

Isadore Randazzo and Tony Evola, herein plaintiffs in error, were convicted, upon a trial on an indictment in two counts, which charged them with violating the provisions of section 197 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10367), for that they assaulted with intent to rob one Ballard Todd of certain mail bags and mail matter, then and there in his lawful charge, control, and custody, and by the second count, for that they perpetrated such robbery, by putting the life of such custodian in jeopardy, by the use of dangerous weapons. To reverse this conviction they bring the case…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Rosen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  5. Langford v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. GottfriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. WoelfleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. State v. GregorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Warfield Milo Goings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. Tommie Lee Dunmore, United States of America v. Ronald Eugene JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API