Legal Opinion

Gribble v. Wilson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1899PublishedCited by 12 opinions

FROM DEKALB. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of DeKalb County. W. D. Smallman, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWilees, J.

This is a motion to retax costs in a suit for slander. On motion of defendant, a special jury was ordered summoned and impaneled to try the suit. Persons were designated by the trial Judge, from whom the jury was selected. The plaintiff, upon trial, was the losing party and by order of the Court the costs were taxed to him. He now moves to retax this cost so as to relieve him of so much as was incurred at and about the summoning, impaneling, and serving of the special jury; in short, all costs incurred on account of the special jury, which was taxed to him by the Clerk, under § 5841 (Shannon…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Pitts v. Nashville Baseball ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State of Tennessee v. William Darelle SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Wilson v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API