Modisette & Adams v. Lorenze
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.
This suit was brought by a law firm claiming $500 for professional services and $72.55 reimbursement for money paid for the defendant’s account. Averring that the defendant was not a resident of the state, the plaintiffs obtained a writ of attachment, by virtue of which the sheriff seized a small tract of land and a lot of drilling machinery, pipe, fittings, etc. An Oklahoma corporation,.. styled Arkansas Valley Oil Company, filed a petition of intervention or third opposition, claiming the property seized, and praying for dissolution of the attachment. The defendant, Lorenze,-, who was then…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hurry v. HurrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Bilich v. MatheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Lampton Realty Co. v. KerrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Boone v. BooneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Toomer v. BreauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Herrmann v. Newark Morning Ledger Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Stanley v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Cox v. CashioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Reading & Bates v. BAKER ENERGY RESOURCESLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.