(PC) Stephen v. Tileston
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JIMMIE STEPHEN, No. 2:20-cv-1841 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 C. TILESTONE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983, and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. As set 19 forth below, the court dismisses plaintiff’s amended complaint with leave to amend. 20 Background 21 Multiple courts have found plaintiff has sustained three strikes under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g).1 22…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.