Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Bloch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1900PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Multnomah: John B. Cleland, Judge. Bill by F. L. Richmond and others against Adelaide Bloch and her children to set aside a conveyance of certain real property. ' Defendants appeal from a decree for plaintiffs on the pleadings.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Wolverton

The plaintiffs commenced this suit November 6, 1897, to set aside the deed of the defendant Adelaide'Bloch, conveying certain real property to her children and co-defendants, Bessie, Viola, Sophie, and Bertha Bloch, and to subject said property to the satisfaction of a judgment given and rendered in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah County, June 30, 1897, in favor of the plaintiff F. L. Richmond and against the defendant Adelaide Bloch and others, for the sum of $1,300, and $94.15 costs and disbursements. The action in which the judgment was rendered was commenced March…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hays v. RegerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Karr v. WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Cain v. CoxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Hansen v. BerthelsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Sieman v. AustinNew York Supreme Court · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chance v. GrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Arntson v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Chance v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. De Vol v. Citizens BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Gottstein v. WistWashington Supreme Court · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API