Legal Opinion

State v. Benoski

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 9, 1971PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBBER, Justice.

An interlocutory ruling denying a motion to suppress evidence in this criminal proceeding has been reported for review pursuant to M.R.Crim.P., Rule 37A(b). Defendants have been indicted and await trial upon a charge of possession of stolen property, namely “one Realistic transre-ceiver, model 18 and one Kennedy tool box, full of machinist’s tools.” 1

On December 19, 1969 Officer Moulton made application to a complaint justice for a search warrant. The application was accompanied by two “affidavits,” both of which the officer says he prepared and signed on December 19 and to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CowperthwaiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. State v. GamageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  3. State v. ThibodeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  4. State v. AppletonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. State v. WilleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API