Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Cannon v. Moran
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 25, 1982No. 81-420PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.
This is an appeal from a judgment declaring that ch. 38, Laws of 1979, is invalid as to plain tiffs because it impairs the retirement contract of each plaintiff and deprives each plaintiff of property without due process of law. The plaintiffs-respondents are judges, either of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals or the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. Chapter 38, Laws of 1979 (which created secs. 40.90-96, Stats. 1979-80), reduces the salary payable to each plaintiff for current service to the State of Wisconsin by an amount equal to the full pension benefit each currently receives from the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cannon v. MoranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Modica v. VerhulstCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Modica v. VerhulstCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Opinion No. Oag 23-90, (1990), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1990