Legal Opinion

DeNuccio v. Caponigro

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBugg, C.J.

The plaintiffs seek to' recover two separate sums alleged to be due on two different contracts. The first is the balance alleged to be due under a written agreement, whereby the plaintiffs were to furnish stock, material and labor in the erection of a garage for the defendants. One clause in that written agreement was that the final payment here sought to be recovered should not be due until “all bills for labor and material have been paid in full.” The report of the trial judge shows that at “the first hearing, it appeared in evidence, that at the time of the request for the final payment…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Webster Thomas Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  2. Judkins v. TullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Duxbury v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Brito v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  5. Cobb v. Library BureauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API