Legal Opinion

Judkins v. Tuller

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 1, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

In this action of tort the plaintiff sought to recover for the conversion of a quantity of automobile supplies and parts. The case was referred to an auditor whose findings of fact were to be final. Judgment was ordered for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted. The writ is dated January 5, 1923.

Prior to 1922, the Milford Automobile Machine Company, hereafter called the corporation, did business under *248the name of F. S. Howard Motor Car Company. It carried on the business of repairing and of selling a certain make of motor vehicle at number 751 Main Street, Worcester. Fred S. Howard was the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Green v. KempMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  2. England v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Bacon v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Horowitz v. S. Slater & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Cohen v. LongariniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  2. Massachusetts Lubricant Corp. v. SoconyVacuum Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Elston v. WilbornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  4. James F. Monaghan Inc. v. M. Lowenstein & Sons Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Handy v. C. I. T. Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API