Legal Opinion

Cary v. Wolff

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided February 7, 1885PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This suit is brought, upon letters patent No. 116,-266, dated June 27, 1871, and granted to the orator Cary, for an improvement in mode of. tempering springs. The specification sets forth that the invention relates to spiral springs usually made in conical form, of steel wire, used in upholstering chairs, sofas, and for bed-bottoms; describes the manner of making them by coiling and forcing hard-drawn steel wire to the proper shape, whereby the outer portion of the wire is stretched, and the .inner portion crushed, and its strength, elasticity, and durability greatly reduced; states the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Brooks v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Eagleton Manufacturing Co. v. West, Bradley & Carey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Colgate v. Western Union Tel. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API