Legal Opinion

Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided September 5, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This is a suit in equity for the infringement of a patent for a process used in the manufacture of Bessemer steel by the direct method.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

This case concerns the art of steel-making. As the difficulties which the patent sought to obviate in that art arose in the Bessemer process, and its practical application has been wholly therein, an account of such process, and its relation to and effect on the art would seem proper, if not, indeed, indispensable, to a proper understanding of the case. And as this patent underlies, and in a measure possibly dominates, the successful commercial converting of Bessemer steel by the direct process, the *723importance of the question involved must be a sufficient warrant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Universal Oil Products Co. v. Winkler-Koch Engineering Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1934
  2. Smith v. American Electric Rabbit Racing Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1927
  3. Cambria Iron Co. v. Carnegie Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  4. Westco-Chippewa Pump Co. v. Delaware Electric & Supply Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API