Legal Opinion

Markarian v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 13, 2001No. C.A. 96-10421-MLWPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WOLF, District Judge.

I. SUMMARY

Plaintiff Mark Markarian (“Markarian”) brought this putative class action on behalf of individuals who purchased certain types of life insurance policies from Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Connecticut Mutual”)1 between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 1992. Markarian alleges that Connecticut Mutual intentionally engaged in *61deceptive sales practices by having agents use a “vanishing premium” sales strategy to sell life insurance policies.

The type of policy at issue in this case has been known both as the “Modified Paid-Up Option”…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Varacallo v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  2. In re Lupron Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  3. Funliner of Alabama, LLC v. PickardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. DeCesare v. Lincoln Benefit Life Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. In re Eaton Vance Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API