Legal Opinion

(UD)(PS) Alvernaz Partners, LLC v. Pitts

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 21, 2020No. 2:20-cv-02022Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALVERNAZ PARTNERS, LLC, No. 2:20-cv-02022-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. SUA SPONTE REMAND ORDER 14 CARLOS REESE PITTS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant Carlos Reese Pitts’ (“Defendant”) 18 Notice of Removal and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) For the reasons 19 set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED as moot, and the 20 Court hereby REMANDS the action to the Superior Court of California, County of San…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Willene Lowdermilk v. United States Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API