Legal Opinion
Clarahan v. Cosper
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1931No. 22644. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
Alleging that Lillian Drenkhahn was engaged to marry him, and was maliciously induced by the defendant to breach that contract, plaintiff seeks in this action to recover damages for humiliation, mental anguish, and loss of time, claimed to have been suffered by him as a result of that breach of contract. Defendant’s demurrer to the complaint was sustained. The appeal is from the judgment of dismissal.
The complaint, the allegations of fact therein being admitted by the demurrer to be true, discloses that on September 19, 1928, Lillian Drenkhahn entered into an oral engagement to marry the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martens v. ReillyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Homan v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
- Leonard v. WhetstoneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- Ableman v. HolmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Davis v. ConditSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nelson Ex Rel. Nelson v. MelvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Ryther v. LeffertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Brown v. GlicksteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- Maxwell v. Eastman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1933