Legal Opinion

State v. McKindel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1928No. 21240. Department OnePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

Appellant, together with one Connie La Marr, were charged by information with the crime of receiving and concealing stolen goods with knowledge that the same had been stolen. They were tried before a jury and a verdict of guilty returned. This appeal follows.

Tbe facts in tbe case are that two places of business in the city of Seattle were burglarized in the month of June, 1926, and several hundred dollars worth of wearing apparel stolen. Police officer McGraw investigated the burglaries and familiarized himself with the description of the stolen garments, and it was reported to him that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. SurryWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State v. DeitzWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Getchell v. PageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  5. Eberhart v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PolsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. GriffinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Fong v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. ProudIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API