Rudy v. Friedman
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County
1Opinion of the Court
LIPPINCOTT, J.,
Plaintiff’s action in assumpsit seeks damages under an oral contract between plaintiff’s decedent and defendants whereby the former rendered “professional architectural services” for defendants, consisting of the preparation of plans and drawings for a complex of apartment buildings. Defendants have filed a preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint on the sole ground that plaintiff’s decedent was not a registered architect as required by the Act of July 12, 1919, P.L. 933, as amended, 63 PS §21, et seq., and, therefore, his estate cannot…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Verona v. Schenley Farms Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Johnson v. HulingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- F. F. Bollinger Co. v. Widmann Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Luce v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Howarth Et Ux. v. GilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.