Legal Opinion

Decko v. Wood

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 21, 1986No. 3118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHendel, J.

This is an action in which the plaintiffs sought an injunction and monetary compensation for damages resulting from the excessive runoff of surface water onto their property as a result of improvements made on the defendants’ adjoining property. After hearing testimony and privately viewing the site in response to the plaintiffs’ motion for a view of the premises, the court rendered judgment for the defendants. The plaintiffs have appealed.

*96The plaintiffs allege that the court erred when it visited the site without a hearing on the motion for a view, without notice to counsel or the parties…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MacKin v. MacKinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Greenberg v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Lavoie v. MarshallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  4. Fowler v. Fayco, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Lake Williams Beach Ass'n v. Gilman Bros.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. State v. KellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  3. Decko v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Revill v. WalworthConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API