Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. Bott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 18, 1987No. 59,734, 59,737PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Herd, J.:

This is a consolidated appeal from decisions of the district courts of Washington and Republic Counties, holding the Family Farm Rehabilitation Act, K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 2-3401 et seq., unconstitutional.

The facts are not in dispute.

No. 59,734

On November 13, 1985, the appellee Federal Land Bank of Wichita filed a foreclosure action in Washington County against the appellants, Delwin, Lois, Herman, and Amanda Bott. On April 11, 1986, the district court granted judgment to the appellee for the amount of the notes plus interest and costs, and for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  3. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. DurrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Zimmerman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Guillan v. WattsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Vakas v. Kansas Board of Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API