Legal Opinion

Monte-Janssen v. Continental Cas. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1953No. 14218_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.

■ Appellant brought this action against the Continental Casualty Company seeking to recover $25,000 “insurance coverage” and an equal amount as a penalty because of the insurer’s failure to pay her claim for insurance. The complaint alleged that petitioner’s husband, on May 7th, 1949, “made application for and did contract to purchase” from the defendant through its agent in New Orleans, Louisiana, insurance for accidental disability or death to be represented by an accident insurance policy in the sum of $25,000, wherein petitioner was to be named as beneficiary. Her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gaunt v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Starr v. Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Western & Southern Life Insurance v. ValeIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Reck v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Hartford Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Martinez v. Louisiana Department of Wild Life & Fisheries ex rel. GuidryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Upton v. Fidelity Standard Life InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Independent Fire Insurance v. LeaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
  5. Landry v. HandleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API