Remington v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Presiding Judge.
On May 21, 1981, the movant pled guilty to having committed sodomy on July 3, 1980. He was sentenced to imprisonment for ten years. By his motion under Rule 27.26, he seeks to set aside that plea and conviction. He alleges he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. In summary, he asserts this is so because counsel did not inform him of the Criminal Sexual Psychopath Act, RSMo 1969, §§ 202.700 to 202.770, and that had he known of those provisions he would not have entered the plea of guilty.
After the movant’s pro se motion was filed, counsel was appointed for him.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Wheatley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Leigh v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Meeks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. CrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Riley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Duggar v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Phillips v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wintjen v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988