Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Northwest Memorial Hospital

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1989No. C-7691PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

MAUZY, Justice.

The court’s opinion of December 14,1988 is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.

This cause concerns the propriety of a trial court’s refusal to allow attorneys to question the venire panel about the alleged “lawsuit crisis.” Artaruth Babcock and husband, Gifford Babcock, sued respondents, Northwest Memorial Hospital, Dr. E.E. Kearns and Dr. Fred DeFrancesco for damages arising out of alleged medical malpractice. During voir dire, the trial judge refused to allow the Babcocks to question the jury panel about the alleged “lawsuit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dennis v. HulseTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Van ZandtTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. GregoryTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Green v. LigonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Standefer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Hyundai Motor Co. v. VasquezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Cortez Ex Rel. Estate of Puentes v. HCCI-San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API