Sanchez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., PRICE, WOMACK, KEASLER and HOLCOMB, JJ„ joined.
We granted appellant’s sole question for review to decide “[w]hat is the appropriate test for harm when the State is allowed to improperly commit jurors to a set of facts?” We hold that the proper test for harm is that set out in Rule 44.2(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,1 and that reviewing courts should use an appropriately tailored set of factors to determine whether the defendant’s substantial rights have been affected. Because the court of appeals did not expressly rely upon Rule 44.2(b) or have the…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Tong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by134 opinions
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Hyundai Motor Co. v. VasquezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.