Legal Opinion
Willis v. City of Atlanta
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 17, 2004No. A03A2434PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MlKELL, Judge.
Michael Willis appeals pro se from the grant of summary judgment to the City of Atlanta (the “city”) on his claims of breach of contract, negligence, and fraud, for which he seeks back pay and attorney fees. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
1. We first reject the city’s contention that this appeal is untimely. The trial court entered four orders from which Willis appeals, on February 12, 1999, March 16, 2000, February 18, 2003, and April 4, 2003. The February 18, 2003, order granted summary judgment to the city, and Willis timely filed a notice of appeal 29 days later, on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peter L. Knight, Dennis L. Wall, Michael D. Mulkey v. Columbus, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Culwell v. Lomas & Nettleton CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Brown v. City of Union PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Smith v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- City of Atlanta v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Latimore v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- COCHRAN MILL ASSOCIATES v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Mbigi v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Majeed v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Fulton County v. LordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.