Harrell v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff alleged that he was "a practicing physician, and while going from the town of Williamston into the country to attend to his patients, with his horse and buggy, he found it necessary to cross the track of said railroad on a bridge, at a point on the public street in the town of Williamston, which had heretofore been constructed by the defendant company, at a regular and usual crossing for persons going into the country in the direction the plaintiff was going on a bridge.
"That near or upon said bridge, in the public street of said town, upon the said day and several days…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norton v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Deligny v. Tate Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Thomason v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Morgan v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Bowden v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Deligny v. Tate Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Dunn v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- McCord v. . Harrison-Wright Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Alexander v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893