Legal Opinion

Alexander v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff alleged that in attempting to cross defendant's railroad at the crossing at Fifth Street, in Charlotte, with her horse and (722) buggy, she was carelessly and negligently run into by defendant's shifting engine, and that she was injured in her person and property — her buggy broken, her horse frightened and thereby rendered less easily manageable, and her shoulder bruised, causing a permanent injury to her right arm, and claimed $1,900 damages.

Defendant denied that plaintiff's injuries were caused by its engine, and charged plaintiff with a failure to exercise ordinary care in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Russell v. Carolina Central R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Norton v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Hinkle v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. McDonald v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Antonian v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  2. Sessoms v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API