Legal Opinion
Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Faulds
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 9, 1945PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrewster, J.
Plaintiff brought this action in replevin for a domestic automatic water softener in defendant’s possession. The action was brought in the City Court of the City of Schenectady where, in a trial had before the City Judge and without *239a jury, plaintiff secured a judgment which has been reversed on appeal to the County Court of Schenectady County and the complaint dismissed.
Originally plaintiff’s assignor delivered the appliance sued for to the defendant in February, 1940, upon a tentative contract of conditional sale, the balance of the purchase price of which, $225, was arrived at by crediting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Orvis v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Meaker v. . FieroNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- McAnsh v. BlaunerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Archer Motor Co. v. RelinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mandelino v. FribourgNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- DeSimon v. Ogden AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re GurinskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Thomas v. Knickerbocker Operating Co.New York Supreme Court · 1951
- WALTER E. HELLER AND COMPANY v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.