Legal Opinion

McAnsh v. Blauner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1928PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The action is upon a promissory note bearing interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum, made and payable at Sarasota, Fla. It appears without contradiction that the note was given pursuant to a written contract as part consideration for the purchase of real estate in Florida and that by the law of Florida eight per cent is the legal rate of interest. The over-technical, dilatory and unsubstantial contention of the defendant that summary judgment should not be ordered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Orvis v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Frank v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dressler v. MV SandpiperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. Prime Manufacturing Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dressler v. The Mv SandpiperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Barone v. FrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Mandelino v. FribourgNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API