Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy, Lee Kum Cherk & Lee Moon Wah v. Shaughnessy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 16, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This is a motion by relators pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.—presumably Rule 34—for production of documents, records and files. While no final disposition has been made of the writ of habeas corpus herein, and while, therefore, that writ is still pending before this court, the hearings before the Special Inquiry Officer have been reopened for a limited purpose. See U. S. ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. Shaughnessy, 123 F.Supp. 674. It appears that these reopened proceedings are now pending before the administrative authorities. The material requested…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API