Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. Shaughnessy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 8, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Respondent has submitted a form of order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. The writ was originally sued out to attack respondent’s right to hold three children of the Chinese race born in China who had been excluded from the United States. They had claimed American citizenship by virtue of one Lee Ha whom they claimed as their father. The Board of Special Inquiry, largely on the basis of blood tests held to preclude paternity, rejected their claim and they were taken in custody pursuant to that determination. I held that relators had been wrongfully denied…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Mar Gong v. Brownell, Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. Lau Hu Yuen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. United States ex rel. Dong Wing Ott v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. United States Ex Rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. United States v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API