Legal Opinion

Johnson v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1970No. 5240PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in a paternity proceeding in the Juvenile Court.

Appellant, the alleged father of an illegitimate child, first contends that the court erred in denying his pre-trial motion to take complainant’s deposition. We have *564ruled that such procedures are not available in paternity proceedings. In re Ketcham, D.C.App., No. 2716 Original (unreported order, June 26, 1964). We are not now persuaded to question that ruling. Under the District of Columbia Court Reform and Criminal Procedure Act of 1970, Pub.L. No. 91-358, § 111 (§ 11-946), 84 Stat. 473, 487,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. District of Columbia v. TurnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. E.R.B. v. J.H.F.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. District of Columbia v. FaisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. X v. YWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
  4. S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. X v. YWyoming Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API