Kyle Pavan v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAltice, J.
Case Summary
[1] Kyle Pavan appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). On appeal, he asserts that the post-conviction court erred in rejecting his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
[2] We affirm.
Facts & Procedural History
[3] On September 28, 2007, the State charged twenty-three-year-old Pavan with class C felony incest for engaging in consensual sexual intercourse with his thirty-four-year-old biological aunt “[o]n or about various and diverse times between November 1, 2006 and January 31, 2007.” Appellant’s Appendix at 19. Pavan ultimately pled…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- McCary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Curtis A. Bethea v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jesse Doyle, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Leif O'Connell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Senaca Lapsley v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019