Legal Opinion
Johnston v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1957No. Civ. 22229PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J. pro tem. *
This is a proceeding in certiorari to review an order of respondent court finding the defendants not in contempt for violation of the injunctive provisions of a judgment of respondent court.
Petitioners are new and used-ear dealers and are the owners of certain real property in the city of Claremont. On April 17, 1951, the property in question was zoned by Ordinance Number 441 as R-l, single family residence, and on December 14, 1954, it was rezoned by Ordinance Number 513 as C-2, commercial use, which includes automobile sales and service. A referendum election on May…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stewart v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Food & Grocery Bureau v. GarfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Ohaver v. FenechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Byington v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Taylor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. Synanon Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Dosch v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. Synanon Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979