Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Nash

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Lake Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The assignments of error call in question the correctness of ‘the ruling of the court below in overruling the demurrer to the complaint and appellant’s motion for a new trial. The material averments of the complaint were substantially proved on the trial. The questions presented for our decision are the same. Instead, therefore, of considering the assignments of error separately, we will condense the averments of the complaint and the facts proved.

The appellant had a depot and side tracks at Crown Point for the reception and discharge of passengers and freight. The plaintiffs were partners…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Champlain Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1851
  2. Adams Express Co. v. DarnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Bansemer v. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Cincinnati & Chicago Air Line Railroad v. McCoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gregg v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KnoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Merchants Despatch & Transportation Co. v. MerriamIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. ReymanIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. KelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API